|
David
Spates
"Therefore I Am"
Published Sept. 17, 2002 |
These watches are a
little out of my depth
How much did your watch cost? I think mine was about 25 bucks,
maybe 30.
Basically it's a piece of junk, but at the same time it's
all the watch I'll ever need. It keeps time. What else could
I ask of a watch?
Some men, however, need more from their watches. They need
status. They need to be noticed. They need a watch that makes
a statement to the world. They need other people to know that
they make a lot of money.
Through all of the glitter, all of the polish and all of the
painstaking attention to every conceivable detail, a $12,000
watch does the exact same thing my $25 watch does. It tells time.
They both have 12 numbers, two hands and a strap. Other than
that, there's very little functional difference.
Sure, maybe the $12,000 model is a tad more precise, but losing
or gaining a few seconds over the course of a year hardly justifies
the price to me. Me, I'm a guy who appreciates function over
form. I need bang for my buck. If I'm going to drop 12 grand
on a wristwatch, it had better do something truly remarkable,
like cook my breakfast or automatically change every red light
to green. For $12,000, I would need James Bond's Q to come by
the house and demonstrate the watch's electromagnetic and telephoto
video camera settings.
But today's $12,000 watches don't do any of that cool stuff.
They just tell time, like my ratty old $25 model. No electromagnet,
no telephoto video camera -- it just ticks. Big deal. If you
want to impress me with your watch, show me a deadly laser beam
or a satellite communications system. How about it, big shot?
Does your watch have that? Otherwise, it's just empty flash.
I think guys who buy these ultra-expensive watches are really
just irked that it's socially unacceptable for men to wear a
lot of jewelry. They want to sparkle like the ladies, but they're
relegated to one, maybe two, rings and a watch. Anything more
than that on a man's hands and he starts to look like a cast
member from "The Sopranos."
So he buys the shiniest, prettiest, fanciest, most expensive
watch he can afford. He straps it on, and heads out into the
world, hoping against hope that someone will notice his spiffy
new watch. I'm no psychiatrist, but I have to think that anyone
to drops $12,000 on a watch is more than just a little insecure
about himself. Talk about overcompensation.
A $12,000 watch? Ha! That's chump change! I might wear a $12,000
watch when I'm mowing the yard or cleaning out the gutters, but
if I REALLY want to impress the neighbors I prefer to sport the
Oyster Perpetual Day-Date Masterpiece Chronometer. Check out
the sales pitch: "Superlative craftsmanship in premium grade
platinum is enhanced with lustrous diamonds. Innovative design
adds new intensity to a celebrated classic. World renowned, Rolex
automatic mechanical movement. Dynamic platinum link bracelet
is fully integrated into the contoured platinum case. Case and
bracelet are highly polished to a mirror-bright finish. Forty
brilliant cut diamonds encircle the perfectly round bezel. Black
Mother-of-Pearl dial shines with ten diamond hour markers."
Quality like that doesn't come cheaply, though. Does $56,500
seem fair enough? No laser. No satellite communications. No electromagnet.
No telephoto video camera. It's just a watch. It is IS water-resistant
down to 100 meters, but heck, my $25 Cheap-O-Matic model is water-resistant
down to 50 meters. Sure, 100 meters is better than 50 meters,
but for a savings of $56,475 I think can limit my diving depths
somewhat.
Who's out there buying a $56,500 watch? I've often wondered
what other items they own that are incredibly expensive but serve
only limited function. Do they have a solid-gold mouse for their
computer? How about chinchilla-lined toilet paper? Do you think
they buy their Diet Coke in titanium cans? If I were a gazillionaire,
I'd want my Crock-Pot to come with a built-in LCD video display
so I could view my pot roast without lifting the lid. What wardrobe
would be complete without a necktie cut from the Shroud of Turin?
And how could a house be a home without throw pillows stuffed
with spotted owl feathers and a panda-skin rug in the living
room?
They say the best things in life are free. For me, however,
the best things in life cost somewhere between free and 25 bucks.
· · ·
David Spates is a Knoxville resident and Crossville Chronicle contributor whose column
is published each Tuesday. He can be reached at davespates@chartertn.net.
|