CROSSVILLE CHRONICLE

Opinion

 

David Spates
"Therefore I Am"

I am the original typing rebel

Helen Brown tried to teach me a better way. Honest, she did. I wouldn't listen though. She showed the limitations of my ways, but I was young and foolish ­ my naiveté surpassed only by my stubbornness. Chalk it up to the foibles of youth.

I know it's wrong, and I am ashamed. For years I have continued my terrible ways, reminded at each success how I never should have gotten as far as I have. I am the exception that proves the rule. I am the "before" picture. I am what parents point to as an example to their children of what not to do. To Helen Brown, I am a disgrace.

And yet, here I am. Making a fair living, all the while thumbing my nose at the establishment. Forgive me, Helen, for I have sinned.

To this day, I have not learned how to type, and I am certain my high school typing teacher, Helen Brown, would be shocked -- nay, appalled -- at my chosen profession.

I took typing in high school for three reasons. The first was that I assumed it would be an easy high B, if not an A. The second was that I thought it would be a useful skill I could carry throughout life. The third was that I thought it would be a good way to meet girls.

I was right about all three. It was a good way to meet girls, as the boy-girl ratio was heavily weighted in my and a few other of my testosterone brothers' favor. It was an easy class, too -- I think I got a B+ or so. And while typing is a useful skill to carry throughout life, it is a skill I could -- let me change that to would -- never learn.

And here I am, the assistant editor of the Crossville Chronicle, banging away at my keyboard with only two index fingers and a thumb. I'm fairly certain I could lose the seven other digits and not miss a day of work. Despite Mrs. Brown's (that's how I referred to her in school) best attempts to break me of my lifelong three-digit typing method, I never mastered the appropriate typing method.

That's not to say I am completely inept in front of a keyboard. The truth is I can move with these two index fingers and a thumb. I've never had a need to be able to type any faster than I can under my method. Granted, the fact that I stop and consider each sentence, or at least each paragraph, for a few seconds probably limits my need for raw speed. But nonetheless, my three digits have served me well for years, and I expect they will continue well into the future.

I was able to, and I'm not proud of this, deceive Mrs. Brown in high school by stumbling along with the appropriate 10-digit typing method when she had her eye on me, but would immediately revert back to my faster three-digit mode the moment her back was turned. I know, I know -- I was only hurting myself. Well, what can I say? I guess I am a typographical masochist.

Mrs. Brown would see how slowly and poorly I typed with the real method, and yet I always scored well on typing tests because I used my three-digit method. I've always wondered if she thought something was up. Surely she must have assumed either something strange was going on or I just stepped up to the pressure of test time and performed exceedingly well.

Regardless of what she may or may not have thought, I always felt a minor tinge of guilt about my deception. You couldn't exactly call it cheating, I suppose, but certainly I wasn't following along with the rest of the herd.

I guess you could call this my confession. I've been living a lie of sorts for years, and it's a relief to unburden this terrible secret. "Yes officer, I'll tell you where the body is buried."

The funniest part of the whole story is that I have chosen a profession in which I spend a great deal of my working time tapping away at a keyboard -- two index fingers covering every letter of the alphabet, plus 10 numbers, and a right thumb whose only purpose in the process is to hit the space bar.

It's amazing how far two fingers and a thumb will take you.
test

Use your browser's back button to return to the previous page