CROSSVILLE CHRONICLE

Opinion

 

David Spates
"Therefore I Am"

NASCAR and hockey need
some serious tweaking

Driving 500 miles in a circle is a sure cure for insomnia. Do you know what would make NASCAR entertaining for me? Inspired by "the most exciting two minutes in sports" last weekend, I've decided that NASCAR needs to take a cue from horse racing ­ line those guys up side by side and give them one lap. You can make the lap as long as you'd like. The race in Daytona would last a minute or so. The races at dinky tracks like Bristol's and Richmond's would be over significantly quicker.

One lap is all you'd need. Whoever crosses the finish line first is the winner. The losers, well, they'll have a nice career peering out from the inside of an Alpo can.

NASCAR also should install betting windows at all of its race tracks. It would be a great way of letting a fan show real support for his favorite driver ­ let him put his money where his mouth is. The drivers would be handicapped, just as in horse racing. Instead of spending this month's rent money on lottery tickets for tonight's drawing of The Big Game, you could instead place bets on Jeff Gordon to win, place or show. The odds sure would be a lot better. I believe the odds of winning The Big Game multistate lottery is approximately 76 million to 1. I'm sure Gordon would draw much better odds than that, say 7 to 1 or so. The payoff wouldn't be nearly that of the lottery, but hey, that's life at the track.

Now I know these changes would lead to some serious problems for NASCAR crews. With just one lap to race, you sure don't need a pit crew. If a driver's car blows up around turn No. 3, his day is pretty much done. I suppose the pit crew guys would have to find vocation in other areas. The guy who fills the gas tank could work at the BP full-service pump, and the dude who squeegees the window might have to take his skills to New York City or some other metropolitan area. I hear window cleaners there do pretty well for themselves.

I've got suggestions for other sports as well.

In hockey, I think the fights should have more of an outcome on the game than just penalty minutes. If a player scores a knockout, that should automatically count as a goal. It would sure make hockey more exciting, wouldn't it? Rather than just a couple of pasty-faced guys pulling each other's shirts over his head and punching like blind kangaroos, bring Mills Lane to center ice and let him referee the fight. If neither player can score a KO after a couple of minutes, then return to the hockey game. When the Stanley Cup championship series is going on, you could have that "Let's get ready to rumble" guy announce the lineups.

In baseball, the fences obviously need to be moved out about 80 feet. I know fans like home runs, but things have gotten rather ridiculous. Today's baseball players dwarf the players of yesteryear, and yet the fields remain the same size. If you put Sammy Sosa or Mark McGwire up against Hank Aaron, you'd never guess all three had baseball as a common thread. Instead, you might suspect Sosa and McGwire were professional wrestlers and Aaron, even in his prime, was a professional bowler. The fields simply cannot hold these monsters to a reasonable number of home runs. Add in factors like baseballs more juiced than Minute Maid and pitching talent thinner than Calista Flockhart after a weekend of bingeing and purging, and it's no wonder that outfielders are watching balls soar farther than Bobby Knight's chair during a technical foul free throw.

I'm sure there would be ways to jazz up Australian-rules football, but I don't understand that game as it is. I remember playing a similar game when I was a kid. It was called Beat The Snot Out Of The Guy With The Ball.

Now THAT was a great game.

Use your browser's back button to return to the previous page