|
David
Spates
"Therefore I Am"
Published Nov. 11, 2003 |
Healthy eating is a personal
choice, not a federal mandate
"Yes, I'd like a 1,458-calorie No. 4 combo, supersized,
please. And a Diet Coke." Nothing washes away hundreds of
calories like diet soda, eh?
I'm all for fighting the battle of the bulge, but I'm not
sure legislation that requires restaurants to post calorie content
is going to make much difference. A new bill is making its way
through Congress' hallowed halls in response to polls that indicate
most Americans would like calories listed along with prices.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat from Connecticut (I think we
all could have guessed that part), introduced the bill in the
House last week, and Sen. Tom Hawkin, a Democrat from Iowa, said
he would introduce similar legislation in the Senate. Two-thirds
of Americans support a requirement for restaurants to list calories
on their menus, according to a survey released last week by the
Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nonprofit group
that backs nutrition labeling.
Part of me thinks this may actually be a good thing. Obesity
and obesity-related diseases are out of control in this country.
It's a health issue, not a cosmetic one. We're too darn fat,
but there's no secret formula to weight gain: If you take in
more calories than you use, you gain weight. If you take in less
calories than you use, you lose weight. If your intake and usage
are about the same, you won't gain any weight. Feel free to shell
out $22.99 for a bestseller if you must, but that's what it all
boils down to.
Although the Center for Science in the Public Interest (who
came up with that name?) says most people want the calorie information,
I'm not convinced it will make much difference. Is there anyone
here who doesn't know that restaurant food is more expensive,
has more fat, sodium, sodium and cholesterol than most anything
you would cook at home?
I think we Americans know restaurant food isn't very good
for us, but we buy it anyway. Why? It's like a little mini-vacation!
Most people's days are filled with activities that accommodate
someone else -- either you're working for The Man or you're with
your kids or you're doing something for someone else. But when
you walk into a restaurant, whether it be a greasy fast-food
dive or a five-star metropolitan bistro, one of the first things
you hear is, "How may I help you?"
Angelic bells ring, birds chirp, a rainbow appears, flowers
bloom, and there is goodness in the world once again. "How
may I help you?" Or, better yet, "What may I get for
you?" Damn the fat grams and full speed ahead! I deserve
it.
We know the food is full of calories and fat. We know that.
The numbers are staggering. At Wendy's, a double cheeseburger
and large fries packs on 1,120 calories, 1,900 mg of sodium and
56 g of fat. At McDonald's, a double cheeseburger and large fries
tips the scale at 1,210 calories, 1,790 mg of sodium and 73 g
of fat. If these numbers are posted alongside the prices on the
menus, is it going to inspire people to order a salad? Judging
by the size of the people I see walking around town, I'm thinking
that most of them aren't rabid salad eaters.
One problem with the bill is that the requirement is only
for restaurant chains with at least 20 outlets. Sure, that covers
the biggies like McDonald's, Wendy's, Red Lobster, Olive Garden,
Outback, Cracker Barrel and such, but why should the local restaurants
be exempt? Twenty outlets seems like a pretty arbitrary number
to me. Besides, if you really want the nutritional information
from any of those big chain restaurants, look it up on the Internet.
Where do you think I got the McDonald's and Wendy's information?
It took me about 20 seconds.
Not surprisingly, the restaurant industry isn't thrilled with
the notion of federally mandated listings. Terrie Dort (sounds
like a nice dessert, doesn't it?), president of the National
Council on Chain Restaurants, said even with the standardized
menus, most chains still pride themselves on being able to customize
entrees, which she added makes it nearly impossible to provide
accurate nutrition data. "Can you imagine the thousands
of different varieties that could go in a pizza?" she said.
Indeed I can. I think I may have tried every conceivable combination.
There should be a special exemption for pizza. After all, it's
nature's perfect food.
When in doubt, seek more information. It's hard to argue that
point, but I just don't know if a federal mandate is the best
way to get America off its ever-expanding can. We have access
to more nutritional and health information today than at any
other time in American history, and yet obesity is at record
levels. Go figure.
The pudgification of America is sandwiched between freewill
and a slice of cheese.
· · ·
David Spates is a Knoxville resident and Crossville Chronicle contributor whose column
is published each Tuesday. He can be reached at davespates@chartertn.net.
|